Both Cathy's and Yehya's posts indicate that ethics and morality are instinctive. In early societies, these instincts led to the development of religion, which in turn became a vehicle for the further development of ethics and morality. We cannot separate religion from the evolution of society...many people today still depend on it for their standard of morality, and I cannot deny that religion has been an important part of the development of my own morality. That others have developed a morality greater than mine without the aid of religion is proof that it is not necessary.
Deism has a great opportunity now to show that. I'm afraid that if UD began collection contributions, it would raise questions as to it's motives...with any charity we have to ask how much is actually being funneled to the specified cause and how much goes toward administration costs and other expenses the donor is unaware of. I don't think it would be necessary to become involved in actual collection of contributions. Personally, what I'd like to see is a listing of organizations providing descriptions of services offered and information on disbursement of funds, and illustrations of why they represent the morality of Deism. And not just programs that benefit the poor, there are others who offer different, but much needed services to society. I heard of one today from Apollo Ohno,
http://www.asklistenlearn.com/. He travels to middle schools to talk to kids about the issues they face, and he emphasizes the importance of communication between parents and teens. This is just one example. I know I've often given, then wondered if it was really the right thing, or if I'd just helped to line the pockets of rich men. What we really need is information, to help us know we're doing the right thing.
I have sincere doubts about even the most staunch atheist in the core of their being truly believing otherwise. I think most atheistic lines of thought are just a denial of the possibilities because they can't fully understand or define it. Some personality types want everything in their lives defined and manageable.
That perfectly describes my Atheist friend, but the defined and manageable part also fits my Catholic husband. It seems that for them, it is a choice between accepting the names and definitions assigned, or rejection of what cannot be defined.
We are all teachers, and what we teach is what we learn, and so we teach it over and over again until we learn.